forsworn_rose: (Beatrix Frowns Upon your Shenanigans)
Beatrix of Alexandria ([personal profile] forsworn_rose) wrote in [community profile] eachdraidh2015-02-09 09:07 pm

Video | Locked to the unseelie | Backdated to the afternoon of the eighth.

[Beatrix was on horseback when she received the news of the destruction of Caer Scima, and she took the time to read over the report several times, then calm the soldiers with her before she decided what to do. They were her first priority, of course, but after that...]

[She eventually took out her locket, addressing it for the first time since she had arrived. Though her expression is neutral, her eye is hard, almost steely.]


I am Baroness Beatrix of the Three Sentinals. [A strange title to her, but it was becoming more natural to her as the days passed.] With the recent destruction of Caer Scima...of home to most of you...I would offer the safety of my spire. It is far from the battles that we wage right now, and well protected. I cannot promise an easy time of things there, but you would be safe enough for the moment.

[Which is probably all they can ask for, right now.]

And to all of you that have questioned this war, look at what has become of our home and think on why you should not, can not, remain standing on the sidelines. Our enemy has shown what they are willing to do, willing to destroy.

Do you think, if they would come and slaughter innocent people in their homes, that they would give a second thought to killing you? All you accomplish standing there wringing your hands is giving them another chance to kill you or someone you care about.

[She hesitates, looking out at the men she is leading, then back.] This is a lesson. A harsh lesson taught at a terrible price, but learn from it, or don't, to your own peril.

[There's the sound of someone calling for her, and she turns away, closing the locket without another thought.]
invisibletouch: (2)

video;

[personal profile] invisibletouch 2015-02-10 03:30 am (UTC)(link)
You'll let anyone stay there?

[Not so much questioning her decision as much as wanting to confirm it.]
invisibletouch: (13)

video;

[personal profile] invisibletouch 2015-02-12 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
In return for what?

[She doesn't really expect her to let people stay without expecting something out of them.]
invisibletouch: (2)

video;

[personal profile] invisibletouch 2015-02-12 03:07 am (UTC)(link)
And it's far from the war?
invisibletouch: (11)

Video;

[personal profile] invisibletouch 2015-02-13 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
I want to ask something.

You don't know anything about me. But you're giving me a home.

Why?
invisibletouch: (8)

Video;

[personal profile] invisibletouch 2015-02-16 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)
[Stares, staying silent for a while before speaking again.]

I won't get in the way.
akweks: (A] don't fuck with me barrett)

audio;

[personal profile] akweks 2015-02-10 05:43 am (UTC)(link)
[Words like that make Connor nervous, but he has to be cautious about it. His tone is careful.] And so what do you propose?
akweks: (A] instagram)

audio;

[personal profile] akweks 2015-02-10 05:50 am (UTC)(link)
Do you speak of defense or revenge?
akweks: (A] looks down)

audio;

[personal profile] akweks 2015-02-10 05:59 am (UTC)(link)
If vengeance is not a factor, then why use the conceit of destruction and slaughter as a rallying point? I ask if your intent is defense or punishment. It is an important distinction to make.
akweks: (A] now you can't not look at that tree)

audio;

[personal profile] akweks 2015-02-10 06:15 am (UTC)(link)
[His tone takes on a bit of an edge at being misconstrued.] It is a responsibility, not a luxury. If we do not make the distinction now, vengeance will rule both sides of this war and it will end in a slaughter.

The important thing to do is to bring people to safety and to stop the destruction, not to rally for war. The time for that is later.
akweks: (W] frowns)

audio;

[personal profile] akweks 2015-02-10 06:36 am (UTC)(link)
[Heatedly] Do not presume to tell me how I speak. You chastise victims of a slaughter and tell them they must take up arms in a war, or else they are complicit. Not to defend their land, nor to protect themselves. I agree they must be repelled, but I do not agree with the tactics you are employing.
akweks: (W] looks)

audio;

[personal profile] akweks 2015-02-11 06:51 pm (UTC)(link)
My priority is to see to the safety of everyone; I said nothing about hiding. But I will not be manipulated by your words, so you waste your breath.
desperate_times: (Default)

video;

[personal profile] desperate_times 2015-02-10 07:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Do you think there's actually any bouncing back from this?
desperate_times: (slow down mate)

video;

[personal profile] desperate_times 2015-02-12 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not quite as optimistic.
desperate_times: (dubious)

video;

[personal profile] desperate_times 2015-02-12 04:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I would prefer to live, however I might do that.
desperate_times: (winky wink)

video;

[personal profile] desperate_times 2015-02-17 04:45 pm (UTC)(link)
[She smiles and shrugs.]

Living itself is worthwhile enough for me.

[She's not a woman who needs to be compelled by causes. That's more of a heroes style.]
skjalf: (♕ In a world of terrible colour)

[personal profile] skjalf 2015-02-11 10:07 am (UTC)(link)
( Flatly: ) Many were lost, and the homes and fields of countless natives, without a doubt. Think-you that if the situation is so dire that you must extend your protection to us, that we are in a strong position to make war?

We are not. The task of rebuilding and recouping our might should take precedence. If we attack them while our position is thus weakened, the likelihood of failure is too high to ignore.
skjalf: (Default)

[personal profile] skjalf 2015-02-13 10:22 am (UTC)(link)
How many more of us must die, lady? We are weak at this time. ( The look on her face communicates just how much she hates to admit the fact. )

The armies yet pursue them, well and so. Those of us whom remain living and number not within their ranks should focus upon rebuilding so that our warriors have something to return to. Should we not?